User talk:Waggers/Archive 11

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Notice This is an archive of my talk page. Please don't edit this page; instead, please post new message on my main talk page.


Archive
Archives
1, 2, 3, 4, 5
6, 7, 8, 9, 10
11


Contents

[edit] User Bardcom

I noticed your concern a short while ago about User:Bardcom and his systematic removal of the term British Isles. He seems to be at it again. Look at this [1], and there are many others recently. Is this guy an expert on all the subjects whose articles he edits? I don't think so. Clearly he's out to expunge the term British Isles from this encyclopedia. In your experience of Wikipedia what can be done about this? 86.27.186.36 (talk) 20:23, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Thank You

Thanks for reverting the vandalism to my talk pages. --Deadly∀ssassin 21:14, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Why is it unconstructive

It shows the public do not like her and the section is on public image and i know it exists you can look yourself i am part of it and as what i think of heather mills what i wrote was restrained :D —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.144.61.26 (talk) 21:32, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

Hi uhm you deleted my edits to the article on call of the wild. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.198.216.241 (talk) 21:41, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Recently blocked vandal

block log. Would you consider a longer block? Also, could you protect the vandal's talk page? thanks Enigma message Review 22:36, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Thank You!

Thank you for reverting the vandalism on my talk page! Kind regards, --Abrech (talk) 09:00, 23 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] What the heck?

The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
Where the hell did you come from? And why are you beating me so much?! The last thing I need is another DerHexer stealing my thunder.... 21655 ωhατ δo γoυ ωαητ? 20:00, 23 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Thanks!

Thanks for the revert on my talk page. You caught that one fast. Tnxman307 (talk) 18:13, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] not vandolizum

--Night shadow187 (talk) 18:19, 25 April 2008 (UTC) i dont think my edits were vandolisum i thouht it was true i will check my info from now on :D ty

[edit] New Project

Myself and several other editors have been compiling a list of very active editors who would likely be available to help new editors in the event they have questions or concerns. As the list grew and the table became more detailed, it was determined that the best way to complete the table was to ask each potential candidate to fill in their own information, if they so desire. This list is sorted geographically in order to provide a better estimate as to whether the listed editor is likely to be active.

If you consider yourself a very active Wikipedian who is willing to help newcomers, please either complete your information in the table or add your entry. If you do not want to be on the list, either remove your name or just disregard this message and your entry will be removed within 48 hours. The table can be found at User:Useight/Highly Active, as it has yet to have been moved into the Wikipedia namespace. Thank you for your help. Useight (talk) 06:57, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] WikiProject Christianity Newsletter

The Christianity WikiProject Newsletter
The Christianity WikiProject Newsletter!
Issue V - May 2008
Article News
Project News
Member News
  • Our membership continues to expand. It is currently at 223 users. 39 new users have joined the WikiProject in the month of April 2008. Please make them feel welcomed!
Christianity Articles by Quality
Make visible or invisible by clicking Show or Hide, respectively.
To do list of the Project
Make visible or invisible by clicking Show or Hide, respectively.
Archives of previous newsletters can be found here.
To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, add your name here.
If you have any news or any announcements to be broadcast, let ~ The Newsletter Editors know.
This newsletter is automatically delivered by Addbot (talk) 15:44, 15 May 2008 (UTC) .

[edit] Greek museums

Did it occur to you that the article may have been vandalised? ♦Blofeld of SPECTRE♦ $1,000,000? 11:39, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] What is the procedure for continued vandalism?

hi Waggers,

I am convalescing in the bath this evening, and am excited by the prospect of exploring how repeated vandalism is coped with in Wikipedia. Are you able to ping me a quick outline of how things would unfold? (assume I am able to compete in the arms race).

I am also curious - were you requested to protect this page, or are you a part time guardian? (Yesterdays edits were not reverted so quickly).

thanks in advance, 88.144.50.200

datestamp for archiving: Waggers (talk) 07:46, 23 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] changes to the The World Ends With You Pin List and noise list

sorry, i made changes that you had to revert. i just wanted to save people time, because i saw some more edits being done to that page even after it was marked for deletion.

ds Waggers (talk) 07:46, 23 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Barnstar

The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
Although there's hardly anything sinister being added to the project at the moment, whatever vandalism does crop up, you seem to be beating me to it! Good 'ole huggle, eh? Keep up the good work ——Ryan | t • c 10:24, 23 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Block info

This looks to be blockable as an open proxy maybe. Just for info - cheers --Herby talk thyme 10:36, 23 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Sorry

I was going to rv my own edit here. Sorry for the note, I happend to be on the same place then my browser was slow so you got it first. Pardon, best regards --Kanonkas :  Take Contact  19:38, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Third Eye

Hi,

Indeed I stumbled upon this article and edited it because the whole first part seemed to me, at best original research, at worst wild claims. The idea of a "third eye tradition" in the Gospel is, to the best of my knowledge, totally unheard of. Even if there happened to be acadamic backing to such readings (which would need to be referenced), there is no question this is a non mainstream theory, which is why it should definitely not be the first heading of the article. 212.234.178.122 (talk) 14:39, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Wes Brown

Dear Waggers,

            I do not think my addition to Wes Brown's page is "unconstructive". As you might be knowing he is part of the Man UTd Champions League Winning team, and he was part of their team during the treble too. He also provided the cross to Ronaldo in the final. This can be checked on any football website. He indeed does deserve a bit of praise, thus I, being a Aston Villa fan and having an unbiased view, feel that this was not at all "unconstructive".

Anyways hope u edit it back, as I feel Wes Brown is an integral part of this United team. Keep it cool, Thanks, ```` —Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.183.159.4 (talk) 21:02, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

He is not my favorite footballer. You can edit his page, and put it in your own words, but I just wanted to tell you about him. When other footballers have descriptions about their assists and goals, why not Brown?I am not saying you have to go over the roof in your praise, but at least his cross to Cristiano should be mentioned. No need to praise, it can be put in a subtle way. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.183.159.4 (talk) 21:09, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for leaving a message.

I recently wrote a reveiw on Kiss The Dustand I'm really dissapointed with the book so thats why I wrote that.

Cheers —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.131.50.252 (talk) 15:08, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Proposed deletion of Bell Farm Christian Centre

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Bell Farm Christian Centre, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? John Carter (talk) 22:36, 30 May 2008 (UTC)