User talk:Waffenkartoffel
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Welcome
Welcome!
Hello, Waffenkartoffel, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}}
on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! IZAK 11:40, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Mscfs3.jpg
[edit] Possibly unfree Image:Mscfs3.jpg
[edit] Greetings
Hi WK, actually I do think you (and Wikipedia) are worth the effort. You're obviously keen to contribute, and you can be a useful editor like many others. However, if you mess around, people will notice it, and will not take you seriously. I'd also suggest avoiding being rude, e.g. saying people aren't worth the effort, and dismissing their musical knowledge. Your choice! Enjoy contributing. Regards, Zaian 06:36, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Speedy deletion of Senior Auxiliary Wind Corps No. 1
A tag has been placed on Senior Auxiliary Wind Corps No. 1, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}}
on the top of the page (below the existing db tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.
For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Strangerer (Talk) 13:36, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Re: Deletion of Senior Auxiliary Wind Corps No.1
Pray, you provide an explanation for the deletion of the Senior Auxiliary Wind Corps No.1. I am trying to develope the ensembles of Churchlands Senior High school into articles, myself being in most of them and CSHS being one of the most prominent music schools in Australia, and the most prominent in Western Australia.
- Waffenkartoffel
[edit] Notability of Churchlands SATB Choral
The article Churchlands SATB Choral has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article seemed to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.
Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Awyong J. M. Salleh 12:26, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] March 2007
Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. As a member of the Wikipedia community, I would like to remind you to adhere to Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy for editors, which you appear to have violated at Cat. Thank you. Gwernol 15:53, 30 March 2007 (UTC)