Talk:W. L. Gore and Associates

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of the Business and Economics WikiProject.
Start rated as start-Class on the assessment scale
??? This article has not yet received an importance rating on the assessment scale.

W. L. Gore and Associates is part of WikiProject Delaware, a WikiProject related to the U.S. state of Delaware.

Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the Project's quality scale.
(If you rated the article please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.)
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

I wonder if the NPOV rule has been maintained in this article. I don't know corporate culture of the company but the description seems to be suspisciously favourable... aegis maelstrom δ 23:46, 26 January 2006 (UTC)

I know what you mean. I think someone from the company edits both this page and Gore-Tex. One the whole it has resulted in an increase in good information, but feel free to add more NPOV to balance the article. -- Solipsist 09:13, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
Most of this article is adcruft. Visit this link. [1] I don't think this article should be deleted but it needs some serious retooling. CJames745 04:35, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
I hated to do it because nothing sounds more interesting than a company that doesn't have managers or CEOs and where salaries are determined collectively, but I have put up the POV banner. From what I can tell about the only part of this article that isn't taken directly from the company website is the information I added about the rule of 150 from Malcolm Gladwell's book. CJames745 04:58, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
Well on further checking, it is this editor who appears to be associated with the company, whilst most of the disputed material came from this edit by User:216.140.123.24. As such this is probably just a copyvio and should be removed. -- Solipsist 08:13, 14 February 2006 (UTC)

I have deleted all edits after October 7 as copyright violation. Chick Bowen 22:33, 25 February 2006 (UTC)