Vuong's closeness test

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

 This article or section is in need of attention from an expert on the subject.

WikiProject Statistics may be able to help recruit one.

If a more appropriate WikiProject or portal exists, please adjust this template accordingly.

In statistics, the Vuong closeness test is likelihood-ratio-based test for model selection using the Kullback-Leibler information criterion. This statistic makes probabilistic statements about two models. It tests the null hypothesis, that two models (nested, non-nested or overlapping) are as close to the actual model against the alternative that one model is closer. It cannot make any decision whether the "closer" model is the true model.

With non-nested and iid exogenous variables, model 1 (2) is preferred with significance level α, if the z statistic

Z=\frac{LR_N(\beta_{ML,1},\beta_{ML,2})} {\sqrt{N}\omega_N}\text{ with }{LR_N(\beta_{ML,1},\beta_{ML,2})}=L^1_N-L^2_N-\frac{K_1-K_2} {2} \log N

exceeds the positive (falls below the negative) (1 − α)-quantile of the standard normal distribution. Here K_1 and K_2 are the numbers of parameters in models 1 and 2 respectively.

The numerator is the difference between the maximum likelihoods of the two models, corrected for the number of coefficients analogous to the BIC, the denominator \sqrt{N}\omega_N equals the sum of squares of l_i=f_1(y_1|x_i,\beta_{ML,1})/f_2(y_1|x_i,\beta_{ML,2})\,.

For nested or overlapping models the statistic 2LR_N(\beta_{ML,1},\beta_{ML,2})\, has to be compared to critical values from a weighted sum of chi squared distributions. This can be approximated by a gamma distribution:

M_m(.,\bold\lambda)\sim \Gamma(b,p)\, with \bold\lambda=(\lambda_1, \lambda_2, \dots, \lambda_m)\,, m=K_1+K_2\,, b=\frac 1 2 \frac {\sum\lambda_i} {\sum\lambda_i^2} and p=\frac 1 2 \frac {{(\sum\lambda_i)}^2} {\sum\lambda_i^2}.

\bold\lambda is a vector of eigenvalues of a matrix of conditional expectations. The computation is quite difficult, so that in the overlapping and nested case many authors only derive statements from a subjective evaluation of the Z statistic (is it subjectively "big enough" to accept my hypothesis?).

[edit] Further reading

  • Vuong, Quang H. (1989): "Likelihood Ratio Tests for Model Selection and non-nested Hypothesises", Econometrica, Vol. 57, Iss. 2, 1989, pages 307-333.