User talk:Vryadly

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] David Suzuki Foundation

Thank you for your query. I'm afraid there is some confusion. At no pont have I claimed that I didn't have an opinion concerning the section in question. Moreover, I've expressed my views in on the discussion page. Victoriagirl 22:59, 27 September 2007 (UTC)

In response to your last post on my talk page: I see a difference in writing that one is "fairly neutral as to whether or not the section should stay as is", and having no opinion whatsoever. Moreover, the section has since been changed, and I have made my concerns known on the article's discussion page. Victoriagirl 00:10, 28 September 2007 (UTC)

My concerns extend beyond those you've mentioned on my talk page. Again, I refer you to my post on the David Suzuki Foundation discssion page. I won't presume to speculate as to Sunray's opinions.Victoriagirl 02:54, 28 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Benes decrees

We only need a final version now and move on. Anyway thanks for getting involved in something so 'far away' from Canada. Squash Racket 04:49, 2 October 2007 (UTC)

I thought that your version (with references) would be acceptable to everyone, I just wanted to add that part on collective guilt, but it would probably make it too long. So the best way would be you adding your already presented version in the article.
"Would everybody agree with the following wording?" The sentence after that. You're right on having more specific details in the article about the decrees. Squash Racket 05:32, 2 October 2007 (UTC)