Wikipedia talk:Votes for deletion/Plum Canary

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Post-closing comment

After this discussion was closed, Radiant made the following comment:

80% is a consensus to delete. See WP:VFU for debate. Radiant_>|< 15:53, September 4, 2005 (UTC)

If any editor honestly believes that there was a 80% consensus to delete, that is a good enough reason for me to re-open the discussion. Please see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Plum Canary (second nomination). --Tony Sidaway^Talk 20:38, 4 September 2005 (UTC)

Dpbsmith added this:

• Delete as advertising, if the discussion is still open. If this discussion is not open, then I don't understand why Plum Canary still exists and links to this page. Dpbsmith (talk) 23:07, 4 September 2005 (UTC)

It's too late to participate in this discussion, and no the article does not point to this VfD. I see that you found your way to the second AfD eventually. The article still exists because we keep articles listed for deletion for which a consensus does not exist for deletion. --Tony Sidaway^Talk 23:22, 4 September 2005 (UTC)