Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/"Zuchini flower"

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was del. Merged into zucchini mikka (t) 04:23, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)

[edit] "Zuchini flower"

Delete. Article makes little sense. Zucchini misspelled. Does not appear worth salvaging. NymphadoraTonks 03:48, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)

• Speedy Delete nonsense/joke/hoax. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 03:57, Jun 21, 2005 (UTC)
  • My mistake, that vote was supposed to be for Nathan todd which is directly above this. Ooopsies. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 12:32, Jun 22, 2005 (UTC)
• Strong keep, but expand and fix spelling. Or possibly merge with Zucchini. Definitely not a hoax or joke. It's a different, and edible, part of the plant from the squash we commonly know. Google gives over 3800 hits for "zucchini flower." Finally, if I was reading a recipe and saw the term "zucchini flower," wikipedia is the first place I'd go to learn more.GeeZee 04:11, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Nothing salvageable. Zucchini already mentions that the flowers are edible and are sometimes served stuffed, which is essentially all that this says; this broken title would not be a useful redirect. — Gwalla | Talk 05:19, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, provides nothing we don't already have in Zucchini. - Mgm|^(talk) 08:51, Jun 21, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. I've made Zucchini flower a redirect to Zucchini. -- BD2412 ^talk 13:11, 2005 Jun 21 (UTC)
• Delete: Duplicate material in all respects. Geogre 16:07, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete misnamed duplicate article. --Scimitar 17:32, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Keep Expanded. Contains useful(?) nonduplicate material. But the spelling of the title needs fixing. --Fishcakefillet 23:54, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Keep and clean up. This is a notable subject. After VfD the name needs to be fixed. Klonimus 20:16, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. nonnotable as separate article. mikka (t) 04:21, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be placed on a related article talk page, if one exists; in an undeletion request, if it does not; or below this section.