Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Victor Lombardi

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was DELETE. From the deletion log:

• 19:51, Feb 26, 2005 Joy Stovall deleted Victor Lombardi (vfd consensus)

[edit] Victor Lombardi

Article fails to establish notability, and consists mainly of external links. Notable or vanity? Radiant! 10:00, Feb 16, 2005 (UTC)

• Delete. Certainly not notable, and probably vanity. Trilobite (Talk) 14:56, 16 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, ad, prolly vanity. Wyss 19:47, 16 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Keep, cleanup and expand. 24,000 hits on Google. Megan1967 04:39, 17 Feb 2005 (UTC)

• Comment: Victor Lombardi is a common name and only a fraction of these hits appear to be related to this individual. Moreover, blogger hits on Google are well-known to be vastly inflated. Wyss 00:22, 18 Feb 2005 (UTC)

• Delete, the organisation he founded isn't even on wikipedia --nixie 00:08, 20 Feb 2005 (UTC)

• Comment: I am the Victor Lombardi this page references, though I am not the author of the page. Perhaps a productive course of action would be to email the authors and/or subjects and ask for certain information to be added to the page (e.g. I've helped further the field of Information Architecture and would happily oblige). Incidentally, most of those Google links do refer to me as I've been publishing on the Internet since 1994. Threefour 21 Feb 2005

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.