Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Ukarumpa International School

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Ukarumpa International School was proposed for deletion. This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was keep

(User:Mirv closed this discussion on 6 Dec 2004. On 10 Dec 2004, the article was deleted by User:Ta bu shi da yu as an unresolved copyright violation. This discussion thread may be used as precedent for a decision to include a future article about the Ukarumpa International School but not as justification for the recreation or undeletion of the version which was a copyright violation. Rossami (talk) 17:06, 10 Dec 2004 (UTC)

[edit] Ukarumpa International School

Nothing on the page suggests this school is notable. Edward 15:09, 28 Nov 2004 (UTC)

  • Delete. Arguable copyvio, too. Ambi 15:12, 28 Nov 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete. Not notable. jni 15:24, 28 Nov 2004 (UTC)
  • Keep - David Gerard 20:52, 28 Nov 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete. Not notable. Gamaliel 21:15, 28 Nov 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete unless evidence of notability provided prior to expiration of VfD. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith (talk)]] 22:14, 28 Nov 2004 (UTC) P. S. I decided to list it as a copyvio, since by far the majority of the contents is a direct copy of the source. The article does cite the source but does not claim permission for release under GFDL. The "age range" stated in the article, "Age range: 5-18" is different from that in the source, which says "Age range: 5-11." I don't know why. Remainder of that section is an exact copy of the source. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith (talk)]] 22:22, 28 Nov 2004 (UTC)
  • Keep. But copyright problems may need to be dealt with... --L33tminion | (talk) 06:32, Nov 29, 2004 (UTC)
  • Keep If copyright issues are resolved. - SimonP 17:35, Nov 29, 2004 (UTC)
  • keep Yuckfoo 05:39, 30 Nov 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete, no evidence of notability. --Fastfission 05:53, 30 Nov 2004 (UTC)
  • delete, what Fastfission said Fledgeling 03:54, 1 Dec 2004 (UTC)
  • Keep. Nothing suggests it's not notable. Dr Zen 03:02, 2 Dec 2004 (UTC)
  • Keep. Intrigue 22:59, 2 Dec 2004 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like other '/delete' pages is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.