Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Tomatocow

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Tomatocow

If groundbreaking levels of spam mean notability, I'm writing an article on my inbox. --fvw* 12:01, 2004 Nov 26 (UTC)

Delete. At best utterly nonnotable. Redlentil 12:03, 26 Nov 2004 (UTC)

  • Delete. This is one of those definitions of "famous" that I think passed me by in English class. Shimgray 12:08, 26 Nov 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete. Not-notable. jni 13:10, 26 Nov 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete. The famous claim is stretching it very far. While Google claims there are 8910 hits for tomatocow, it will only display 148 when too similar entries are omitted. Of those 148 a lot seem to link to free photos and wallpaper. Wålberg 13:32, 26 Nov 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete: It's a goof. Minor thing. Geogre 14:19, 26 Nov 2004 (UTC)

[edit] Anonymous comments

This forum is very important for some people on the Internet community, so it should be noted by Wikipedia. It should not be deleted. -- Sex2 13:28, 26 Nov 2004 (UTC)

  • This is users first edit in Wikipedia. jni 13:10, 26 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Leave it! I find it _very_ hilarious, even though I'm not a forum member. 12:39 (GMT)

  • This is by anon 80.221.207.3. jni 13:10, 26 Nov 2004 (UTC)

It would be a very grave mistake to remove this significant item. For some members of the web community, the said forum is their only source of social interaction. :nods:

I think with the amount of people that visit the forum I see little reason to delete the information on this page. The anyone who thinks otherwise is very closeminded.

  • I'm sure it's an important forum for those who use it, but that does not necessarily mean it should be in the Wikipedia. There is no point in having the article, if it only will be looked up by people who already use and know what Tomatocow is. Plus the fact that the article at present does not even qualify as a stub IMHO. Wålberg 14:23, 26 Nov 2004 (UTC)

The forum would be looked up by people from the Paradox forum that might be interested what the Tomatoforum really is. There are many misunderstandings and this would be one way for us to explain it. The article will be further developed if it's not deleted. Sex2 16:51, 26 Nov 2004 (UTC)

This is my own opinion. Keep this work in progress open. Many people of dignity need this.