Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Todd McCormick

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Todd McCormick was proposed for deletion. This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was Keep as a redirect. Rossami (talk) 21:34, 11 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Article does not establish notability. RickK 06:12, Oct 24, 2004 (UTC)

  • Keep and expand. Todd McCormick was the first person to be arrested for medicinal marijuana related charges after the passage of California Proposition 215. Noteworthy under these conditions. Radman1 06:24, 24 Oct 2004 (UTC)
Yes, merge and redirect. Radman1 19:59, 24 Oct 2004 (UTC)
    • But if he's only notable in the context of California Proposition 215 then he only deserved a mention in that article, not his own article. Merge and redirect. Gdr 06:40, 2004 Oct 24 (UTC)
  • Delete or at least stub and define why this apparent non-entity is in point of fact notable. There are plenty of (i.e. 99% probably if they thought they could get away with it) marijuana users who would no doubt argue this in mitigation. Sjc 06:44, 24 Oct 2004 (UTC)
  • !!!!!! First of all... you worship hitler if you think this should be deleted. While we're at it why don't we delete the article on Buddha? What's so notable about it? Expansion will come... it was just placed as a starting point. -- Unsigned by User:65.97.17.149
    • I'm baffled beyond belief. And it seems that I worship Hitler. -- [[User:Bobdoe|BobDoe]] 07:38, 24 Oct 2004 (UTC)
    • ZEIG HEIL! VE MUST MERGE AND REDEERECT ZE MEDEECINAL MARIJUANA MAN! OOTEN EETEN HAUTEN GLOBEN! Lord Bob 08:03, Oct 24, 2004 (UTC)
    • Anonymous votes don't count, even from the author of the page. One-liner about some poor guy who can't get dope. There are lots of them. Delete. — Bill 11:55, 24 Oct 2004 (UTC)
  • Merge into California Proposition 215 (1996) and redirect. —Stormie 08:55, Oct 24, 2004 (UTC)
  • Merge and redirect, unless he's written a book or something. [[User:Meelar|Meelar (talk)]] 15:54, Oct 24, 2004 (UTC)
  • Merge and redirect: When he's famous for something other than getting busted, he can get an article. Right now, the law is notable, and the first dude to go the can over it isn't. Geogre 16:27, 24 Oct 2004 (UTC)
  • When there's a notable event that involves an otherwise nonnotable person, the content should probably be put with the event, with the person mentioned only in the entry on the event. Whether to redirect at that point is an open question. Delete or Redirect --Improv 17:42, 24 Oct 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete or merge. The article, as it's currently written, is a borderline speedy candidate ("Jimmy Spligbertt is a guy who has the fuzz all up in his face for playing his stereo too loud..."). -R. fiend, Schutzstaffel Kommandant 17:53, 24 Oct 2004 (UTC)
  • I am not certain that this even deserves a merge, but it should definately be removed as an independent article one way or the other. Indrian 17:57, Oct 24, 2004 (UTC)
  • Merge redirect is the sensible thing to do (to California Proposition 215) —siroχo 22:19, Oct 24, 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete. McCormick isn't notable for getting busted; just unlucky. Wile E. Heresiarch 22:40, 24 Oct 2004 (UTC)
  • I worship Hitler errr... I mean Delete. :) NeoJustin 05:56 Oct 25, 2004 (UTC)
  • According to BJAODN, Hitler likes people with funny faces. That must mean Mr. McCormick is a clown. To make matters worse, I agree with Schutzstaffel Kommandant Fiend as well. Merge and redirect. The title certainly is legit if the article as it stands is not. Love, Field Marshall Schickelgruber, aka Lucky 6.9 05:58, 26 Oct 2004 (UTC)
  • Merge/redirect to California Proposition 215 (1996), or keep. —siroχo 14:03, Oct 29, 2004 (UTC)
  • Merge and redirect. — Dan | Talk 00:00, 1 Nov 2004 (UTC)
  • Merge with California Proposition 215 (1996) and then Delete. --Nought 00:05, 1 Nov 2004 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like other '/delete' pages is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.