Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/The real Howard Stern

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

  • Delete I guess or cleanup, although I kind of agree with the sentiment... 66.238.96.194 07:03, 21 Aug 2004 (UTC)
  • The article it redirects to is ok, but the redirect page itself needs to be deleted. [[User:Supadawg|supadawg - Talk]] 14:07, 19 Aug 2004 (UTC)
  • I know people are going to be really mad at me for writing this, but I say keep it. The article lets readers know just how crazy and hateful Howard Stern really is. Crevaner 14:13, 19 Aug 2004 (UTC)
    • If any of the stuff from this article is factual, it belongs on the Howard Stern article, not in a separate article by itself. DJ Clayworth 14:18, 19 Aug 2004 (UTC)
    • Wow, I didn't know that Wikipedia was an Op-Ed forum for people to express their opinions about folks they don't like. I'll get started on my The real Dick Cheney article at once. No one's mad at you Crevaner, but we should give people the facts and let them make up their own minds. - Eisnel
  • This article is now a redirect. To see the reasons for deletion, (vile polemic rant) go back to the history. Oh, and Delete. DJ Clayworth 14:17, 19 Aug 2004 (UTC)
  • Vile rant about a vile person... oh well. The redirect still needs to be deleted. DannyBoy | Talk 14:28, 19 Aug 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete. It's history should not be preserved and it's not the least bit useful as a redirect. While this article is on death row, if someone can copy facts in an NPOV manner to the Howard Stern article, so much the better. - Eisnel 20:39, 19 Aug 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete the redirect. It's ridiculous. Bishonen 23:48, 19 Aug 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete the redirect. I wish we could vote to delete the real Howard Stern's shows this easily... Fire Star 00:19, 20 Aug 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete useless redirect. — Gwalla | Talk 02:48, 20 Aug 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete libelous article completely. -- Cyrius|✎ 00:07, 21 Aug 2004 (UTC)