Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Tempus Spatium

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Tempus Spatium was proposed for deletion. This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was DELETE

Non-notable, probable vanity-by-proxy. --fvw* 03:18, 2004 Dec 17 (UTC)

Delete. [[User:Neutrality|Neutrality/talk]] 03:19, Dec 17, 2004 (UTC)
Delete. - Ld 03:38, 17 Dec 2004 (UTC)
  • Here are the 8 hits for "Tempus Spatium" +Sputnik. Talk:Decimal time sheds a bit more light on Tempus Spatium. Decimal time would likely be the best place to merge this information, if the editors there would take it, but I doubt they would. Samaritan 04:08, 17 Dec 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete. This article was posted by "European futurist Dorian Aescher" (sic) himself, as I recognize the IP, and the term is not used by anybody else. Nike Missile 06:10, 17 Dec 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete. Original research. jni 06:41, 17 Dec 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete. dicdef, neologism. It doesn't matter if it's vanity or not... P Ingerson 08:02, 17 Dec 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete. One person's neologism without evidence of broader usage. - Andre Engels 09:53, 17 Dec 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete: I can imagine the process. "You mean 'Space Age' is already taken? Damn. Ok, I'll call it, uh, the, ummm, Tempus Spatium!" Detail about a particular person's speculations, not in context, with no significance. Geogre 23:19, 17 Dec 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete, to put it politely, this is vanity. Wyss 02:19, 19 Dec 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete. This guy already got his "Sekants Time" deleted. RSpeer 23:13, Dec 22, 2004 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.