Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Strategiance

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. · Katefan0^(scribble) 20:41, 14 September 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Strategiance

Neologism, stated as such in art, not in wide use, so not approprioate for wikticionary either. Delete. DES ^(talk) 17:25, 23 August 2005 (UTC)

• Delete All user's other postings are rightly up for Deletion. Don't wikticionary this. Dlyons493 18:20, 23 August 2005 (UTC)
• Delete per nominator, like everything in the Lanz Chan vanity series. --IByte 23:26, 23 August 2005 (UTC)
• Comment: original nominator did not list entry on Articles for deletion, now fixed (no vote) Doc (?) 10:12, 5 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete At least they made it easy by admitting it is a neologism. Worthless. Paul 03:02, 14 September 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.