Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Steve McConnell

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was KEEP. -Splash^talk 21:55, 19 September 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Steve McConnell

vanity, likely self-published, self-promotional in nature, of limited notability —Preceding unsigned comment added by Deansaling (talk • contribs) 00:42, 21 August 2005

• Completely disagree. McConnell is a well known software engineer, and his books are not at all self-published. The page may be promotional, but it's certainly not self-promotional. I say Keep. coldacid 15:05, 2005 September 8 (UTC)
• This vfd nomination was orphaned. Listing now. Keep, seems notable enough. —Cryptic (talk) 08:36, 9 September 2005 (UTC)
• Keep McConnell is the author of very well-known & influential software engineering books, particularly Code Complete. SpuriousQ 08:41, 9 September 2005 (UTC)
• Keep and hopefully expand and/or restructure. --Jacqui M Schedler 16:07, 9 September 2005 (UTC)
• Keep I own two of his books, published by Microsoft press. Hardly non-notable. DES ^(talk) 22:03, 9 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete Vanity. --Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho 00:17, 10 September 2005 (UTC)
• It reads like book cover copy, if not then Keep and cleanup, too informal (first name use) for encyclopedia._WCFrancis 01:50, 10 September 2005 (UTC)
• Keep Well-known author, but the article really needs some serious clean-up. -- THL 07:17, 16 September 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.