Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Shlomi Harif

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete --Allen3 ^talk 12:46, August 17, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Shlomi Harif

Googling for that name gets 235 hits, many of whom are not the same person. Harif's writing may have been published in magazines, but this is not an indicator of notability; I am a published writer and I do not expect an article in Wikipedia. Harif's claim to fame seems to be having published chapbooks. It did not take long for me to learn that a chapbook is a home-published book, using your own computer and printer. Denni☯ 23:44, 2005 August 10 (UTC)

• Delete. Tikkun is legit, I don't know of any of the others. It sounds like a vanity page, presumably written by the subject, which argues against its inclusion IMO (if he was notable, someone else would have created it.) Note that the creator is spamming the name around [1]. Note that a chapbook is not necessarily vanity published -- but in this case, it probably is. Sdedeo 00:46, 11 August 2005 (UTC)
• Delete agree with both of the above. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 02:23, August 11, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Looks liek a lot of jibberish. length of stay has nothing to do with it IMO.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.