Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Saturday Night Live Number 364

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was - no consensus - SimonP 05:39, Mar 29, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Saturday Night Live Number 364

More of the same: non-notable, useless, unencyclopedic. /sɪzlæk˺/ 09:21, 12 Mar 2005 (UTC)

• Why don't we delete them all then? -- Riffsyphon1024 09:24, Mar 12, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. See my reasoining at Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/List of Saturday Night Live episodes. Tygar 10:20, Mar 12, 2005 (UTC)
• Keep Star Trek individual episodes can have Wiki entries' why should SNL be any different? Samboy 10:41, 12 Mar 2005 (UTC)
  • Yea, but then everyone will want an episode list. The trek episodes should really be in Memory Alpha. -- Riffsyphon1024 10:48, Mar 12, 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete. Star Trek episodes have a unifying plot. SNL does not, so needs no article to describe each episode. DaveTheRed 19:27, 12 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Keep, episodes of star trek, and notable comedy shows are important enough for an unlimited encyclopedia. Kappa 11:55, 12 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. I have a strong suspicion that most Star Trek episodes shouldn't have their own articles, and that we would be better served by a few articles summarizing key plot arcs and characters. As I've mentioned elsewhere, we already have articles on notable SNL sketches and characters, and a list of all the hosts and musical guests. This is too much granularity. --TenOfAllTrades | Talk 15:26, 12 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. What encyclopedic value can there be in just a list of sketches that were done in the same show? --BM 19:58, 12 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, not notable as an individual episode. Megan1967 01:29, 13 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. Everyking 02:05, 13 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Utterly useless, as above listing. Not encyclopedic at all. -R. fiend 02:25, 13 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Keep - verifiable and of third-party interest - David Gerard 14:52, 13 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Keep interesting information not easily found elsewhere Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 14:50, Mar 14, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, no potential to become encyclopedic--nixie 01:13, 15 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Strong keep; comments at Wikipedia:Votes_for_deletion/Saturday_Night_Live_Number_548.
• Keep: Information is verifiable, informative, and of interest to end users. —Caesura 17:25, 17 Mar 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.