Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Saint-Chély-d'Aubrac

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was Keep --Allen3 talk July 5, 2005 19:37 (UTC)

[edit] Saint-Chély-d'Aubrac

Not Encyclopedic, POV, Seems to be a list of external links made by a first time Wikipedian. Either Delete it or Rewrite the artcle. What part of Saint Chély d'Aubrac is noteable anyway? — Kjammer ⌂ 06:08, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Comment: Author attempted to remove the VFD tag. — Kjammer ⌂ 09:18, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep, real place. Kappa 10:48, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep and Redirect to St chély d'aubrac which I have just spent some time cleaning up. Perhaps it should be the other way round. I don't think that towns have to be notable. Cutler 11:13, Jun 25, 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep. We can have small French towns, just as much as all those one-horse places in the USA. Charles Matthews 11:46, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Merge with Saint Chély d'Aubrac and move to Saint-Chély d'Aubrac. DoubleBlue (Talk) 15:04, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Comment - I have followed DoubleBlue (Talk)'s suggestion and tried to write something sensible at Saint-Chély d'Aubrac. Will it do? Cutler 15:23, Jun 25, 2005 (UTC)
    • Works for me. Now all the others should be redirects. DoubleBlue (Talk) 15:54, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • 'Keep Saint-Chély d'Aubrac article with others as redirects and expand. Real place with real community of interest. Capitalistroadster 16:14, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep and redirect, I suppose. We have myriad nearly-nonexistent town, hamlets and outposts from several countries and France should be no different. I'm concerned that the new article is one long list of links with little actual material, but that's a different discussion. -Splash 23:54, Jun 25, 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep as for other such places. First time contributors are not bad people who should be punished for any mistakes they make. CalJW 00:07, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)
VfD is by no means punishment. It's just the community's way of maintaining some sort of standard in the 'pedia. -Splash 00:35, Jun 26, 2005 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be placed on a related article talk page, if one exists; in an undeletion request, if it does not; or below this section.