Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Sahara Knite

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was DELETE. Thryduulf 21:56, 22 September 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Sahara Knite

Completing VfD lising - no vote---Doc (?) 13:20, 4 September 2005 (UTC)

Nn. Possible advertising/vanity. Not sure if the muslim part is verifiable either.-- BMIComp (talk, HOWS MY DRIVING) 19:14, 3 August 2005 (UTC)

• She is not the first Muslim Porn Star. There is evidence of this on the net. There is/was an article on YNOT where Sahara's ex mentor was quoted in December 2004 as having worked with other Anglo Indian Muslim models before her. This article was published some time before Sahara decided to announce she was the first and therefore her stating that she is the first, is a blatent untruth. (unsigned vote by User:84.66.112.173)
• Delete NN. And since when did a porn model or porn actress automatically become a porn "star"? Denni☯ 23:31, 2005 September 4 (UTC)

More eyeballs needed. I'm not comfortable deleting with only one concurring editor — but someone tell me if I should be deleting these anyway. -Splash 00:29, 13 September 2005 (UTC)

• Keep The relevant consideration is whether she has appeared in commercially distributed films viewed by 5,000 people. The fact that she has been mentioned in the Sun is indication that she has some profile as does the issue as to whether or not she is a pioneer. Capitalistroadster 00:50, 13 September 2005 (UTC)

Delete A Google search for thos woman shows just 293 hits see [1] This shows a lack of notability given the general presence on the Internet. As far as the query from the anonymous user the 5000 was from an old version of WP:Bio which appears to have been changed for entertainment figures - very much for the better as far as I'm concerned. Capitalistroadster 08:38, 13 September 2005 (UTC) A question Capitalistroadster...

You are in Australia and the model being discussed is in the UK, so where do you get your figure of "viewed by 5,000 people?" I'm not voting to keep or delete the emtry, I just feel that if there is one, it should be the truthful one and not one made up by the model for the press. This is meant to be an on line encyclopedia and not a comic.

• Delete. She's not the first porn model of Muslim origin, and taking your clothes off and lying in the Sun does not make you notable. TheMadBaron 02:39, 13 September 2005 (UTC)

• Delete: Boobycruft: Being naked is something Bob Dylan says even the President of the United States has to be some time, and the rationale for a biography is false. Geogre 12:46, 13 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete per above Paul 15:26, 13 September 2005 (UTC)

Capitalistroadster...

Sorry to have to correct you... If you do a search on Google for the words "sahara knite" the figure of "293" is for listings containing these two words, and not the number of hits or searches. If you go through the full list you will see many might be for "sahara" as the desert and not for "sahara+knite". There are also listings for "knite" without "sahara". Also, being listed on Google by name means nothing. Being listed high on any search engine is a success when you can use unrelated terms, ignoring a persons name, and they appear. A particular search without using her name on MSN has her listed at #1 and this is a search by the nature of her work, which I won't give details, but I can assure you is the most popular search term used everywhere on the net.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.