Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/SDA Pathfinders
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was - should be merged
[edit] SDA Pathfinders
Advertising. Unnecessary daughter article, substantive expansion could be merged with Seventh-day Adventist Church if rewritten (which is where anon began by adding external link [1], [2], before creating a new article by possible copyvio at SDA Pathfinders.) - Amgine 01:45, 7 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Delete advertising Cdc 03:19, 7 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Delete: Non-profit prophet ad. Geogre 03:51, 7 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Strong Keep I cleaned it up (massively). With 30,000 people attending their 2004 Camporee, and founded in 1907, it's notable. Wyss 22:28, 7 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- I appreciate the cleaning, and I'd like to change my own vote, but I wonder about the title and whether it should be discussed separately from the Seventh Day Adventist article. The question, to me, is whether anyone will search by "SDA Pathfinders." I had thought not. Geogre 03:28, 8 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- They say they're open to non-church members. Although the group almost certainly has a proselytizing role, it seems separate enough to me to have its own article. Wyss 12:37, 8 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Merge with Seventh-day Adventist Church. The cleanup convinces me that this should be mentioned, but it does not deserve an article of its own, and the SDA article is not so large that this would unduly clutter it. Indrian 00:27, Dec 11, 2004 (UTC)
- ""Merge" with Seventh-day Adventist Church. Agree that cleanup made information worth keeping and it would easily fit in the SDA article
- Merge with Seventh-day Adventist Church. Don't delete any informaiton at all; I've heard of these guys. Samboy 23:28, 12 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.