Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Remnant Pokémon

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was DELETE. Golbez 08:57, Jun 18, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Remnant Pokémon

non notable and messy Melaen 19:29, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)

• I disagree with you on a subtle point; the Missingno and Mysterio pokemon glitches are well-documented, scrutinised parts of the Pokemon games. That is why they are covered in those articles. This article is factually incorrect, as well: Pikablu and Houhou are now canonical pokemon. This article is redundant and should be deleted. jglc | t | c 20:06, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, outdated and irrelevant information. --Sn0wflake 00:32, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete redundant fork. JamesBurns 07:45, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete outdated, not very useful to anyone Sonic Mew 11:50, Jun 9, 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.