Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Quoth the raven, Eversor

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Quoth the raven, Eversor was proposed for deletion. This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was to delete.

Original material. 62.252.64.14 12:20, 22 Nov 2004 (UTC)

  • there's no reason to exculde this example. If you want something to delete, I suggest you look at United Overseas Bank, or Greektragedies. Keep Dracula the bat 12:37, 22 Nov 2004 (UTC)
  • Keep - good article, maybe bulk it out a bit, but definetly keep. Dr Chicken -- Note: No such user Dr. Chicken existed at the time this vote was cast. His 'user page' was the creation of Forgotmytea, and it was 212.219.191.134 who added his vote to this page.
  • Nice, but doesn't fit into Wikipedia poem. Delete. Dr Chicken 12:50, 23 Nov 2004 (UTC) See above and see edit history, which has three votes at this time

Keep - cant see any good reason why it should be destroyed - I quite like it.... 56.581.93.77 -- Note: "Anon" vote has been added by User:Dracula the bat

  • Delete. A completely non-notable poem. Anyone can write a parody poem, but even if it's good it doesn't merit a Wikipedia article until it becomes notable. Remember, Wikipedia is a secondary source for information about our world, not a place for posting some poem you wrote/found. [[User:Livajo|力伟|☺]] 12:46, 22 Nov 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete, original material -- Ferkelparade π 12:47, 22 Nov 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete - Livajo says it all. - Andre Engels 13:10, 22 Nov 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete. Non-notable poems make the Baby Jesus cry. - Randwicked 13:16, 22 Nov 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete. Original fiction. - RedWordSmith 13:27, Nov 22, 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete. Original paraody. - Mailer diablo 13:29, 22 Nov 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete: We're not a poetry site (thank goodness). This is terrible, too. Geogre 14:49, 22 Nov 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete. Deletable on so many levels. Only of interest (only comprehensible!) to fans of one particular game (OH GNOS He Is Implying The F-Word); original material; not-notable. Very few poems get their own articles, let alone notable parodies of those poems getting articles, let alone modern parodies of those poems which only make sense to players of one game. Oh, and extra style points off for a) tampering with the VfD and b) pulling the old "delete these articles instead" gambit. -- Antaeus Feldspar 16:15, 22 Nov 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete as original material. Side note to all those who are going to forge anon votes: xx.581.xx.xx? Give me a break. Lord Bob 21:48, Nov 22, 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete. NeoJustin 02:59, Nov. 23 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete. Either it's a copyright violation or it's original work; either way it's crap. —No-One Jones (m) 11:00, 23 Nov 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete' -- Infrogmation 22:26, 24 Nov 2004 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like other '/delete' pages is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.