Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Projector (album)

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was KEEP. dbenbenn | talk 01:35, 24 Feb 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Projector (album)

Radiant! 10:42, 12 Feb 2005 (UTC): Tracklist of an album.

• Keep Kappa 10:34, 12 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Comment pages for albums should probably have a little substance than a track list and a potentially copyrighted image. a summary of critical reception, description of the sound of this album vs others, etc. Nateji77 13:15, 12 Feb 2005 (UTC)
  • Ideally yes, tracklists should stay on the artist's page until they become articles, but there are far too many albums stubs to bother merging. Kappa 17:43, 12 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, article as it stands is un-encyclopaedic. Megan1967 02:09, 13 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Keep valid album stub. needs work but its worth keeping and being fixed.  ALKIVAR™ 06:07, 13 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, unencyclopedic fork. Wyss 12:14, 13 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. I think its been established by now that albums are worthy of articles (there's thousands of them, in case you haven't noticed). Xezbeth 12:20, Feb 13, 2005 (UTC)

Mine's just a single vote, a single opinion. :) Wyss 18:22, 13 Feb 2005 (UTC)

• Keep Tuf-Kat 03:51, Feb 14, 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.