Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Pokémon Jade
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete (blk-cmp error). – ABCD 20:56, 4 Apr 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Pokémon Jade
- The Pokemon Jade the author is referring to does not actually exist; it was a con on Ebay. unsigned nomination by User:Trip the Light Fantastic on 15 Feb 05
- AGAINST It's still small but it could be expanded and then talk about the what it really was, a rehashing of a diffrent japanese game. unsigned comment by user:Saint-Paddy
- Looks like User:Trip the Light Fantastic botched the nomination process and this never made it onto VfD. No vote at this time. -- Cyrius|✎
- Delete, gamescruft. Megan1967 06:21, 23 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. Pokécruft. I'd say marginal merge and redirect to ebay fraud, but that itself is a redirect to EBay. android↔talk 06:40, Mar 23, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete if it really doesn't exist. BTW, why aren't there Pokémon White and Pokémon Black? — JIP | Talk 07:59, 23 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. If this were fancruft I would be voting keep, but this is not one which even existed, so I cannot. Sjakkalle 09:32, 23 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. 199 11:39, 23 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Question. If a page listing of famous eBay frauds are created, can this be added to it? Zscout370 18:04, 23 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Delete, when will these people give up trying to stuff Wikipedia with pokecruft? VladMV ٭ talk 21:28, 24 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Delete now, pokecruft. ComCat 05:28, 25 Mar 2005 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.