Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Plan of Discipline

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was transwiki to Wikisource. sjorford →•← 10:09, 17 Apr 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Plan of Discipline

Military text. Should be in wikisource instead. --Radiant! 10:42, 12 Feb 2005 (UTC)

• Transwiki --Radiant! 10:42, 12 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Transwiki. Pure extract from existing source. HyperZonk 22:54, Feb 12, 2005 (UTC)
• Transwiki. Megan1967 02:02, 13 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Transwiki--ZayZayEM 14:00, 13 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. This is a historically significant document that is still actively referenced during US military training today. While there is not yet any good commentary in the article about Roger's Rules, there could and should be. I can't get to it right now but will add it to my to-do list. Rossami (talk) 21:18, 14 Feb 2005 (UTC)
  • <humble> You're right. Transwiki.</humble> Rossami (talk)
• Transwiki. Primary sources belong in WikiSource. No need to keep it here, regardless of historical significance. When we have something encyclopedic to say about it, we can link to it from an article here. — Ливай | ☺ 04:49, 15 Feb 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.