Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Peter Walton

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was DELETE. -Splash 23:12, 11 September 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Peter Walton

VfD not previously listed - no vote--Doc (?) 20:26, 3 September 2005 (UTC)

• It is not often that I put things up for deletion, but, looking through the recent changes, this article caught my eye. Does this referee deserve an article? I have checked the internet, and, despite being in refereeing for such a long time, he has only ever officiated over very few top-flight games; the BBC lists 16 Premiership games, but perhaps that was only from one season. Nonetheless, I can find nothing remarkable about his life, or any controversial or important decision that he has made; so, I do not really see why this guy deserves an article above any other run-of-the-mill FA referee. If there are compelling reasons, I would love to know (although I am not much of a football fan;) but I cannot see what is notable about him, other than his being a select referee. That should take up a line, not a whole page. IINAG 23:33, 24th August 2005 (UTC)
• Delete--referees aren't inherently notable (indeed, if they do their jobs well, they don't get noticed at all). Meelar (talk) 23:50, September 3, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Article fails to convince that he was worth an article, & only 1 link to this article. (I guess Meelar is wrong: look at all of those famous referees at Referee (football)!) -- llywrch 00:13, 4 September 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.