Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Nick Diak

Gotta give this guy some due credit for at least submitting well-written vanity. Delete and move to new user page. - Lucky 6.9 02:13, 21 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- RE-delete. I noticed this article because it was a blue link in the delete log. (Actually the article is grammatically preposterous, with subjects randomly switching within sentences. It only looks like it's well written. iMeowbot~Mw 02:23, 21 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Ooh, you're absolutely correct. Shoulda read that more closely. Let's make that speedy delete of reposted ca-ca. - Lucky 6.9 02:29, 21 Dec 2004 (UTC)
YADV (yet another delete vote) -- Hoary 02:38, 2004 Dec 21 (UTC)
Strong delete Vanity page. Johntex 04:31, 21 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Delete. The previous delete appears to have been a speedy, but vanity is not suitable for speedy.-gadfium (talk) 06:10, 21 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Delete. Vanity. utcursch 09:59, Dec 21, 2004 (UTC)