Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Nautilus Middle School

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was keep. Sjakkalle (Check!) 4 July 2005 14:39 (UTC)

[edit] Nautilus Middle School

Doesn't seem like a notable school and has no good content. Seems like school articles have been debated a lot in the past, but I feel as if there needs to be more than one line to keep it. — Ilγαηερ (Tαlκ) 20:01, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)

• Delete, that one line is even POV. I urge school inclusionists to leave a link in a school project, let it be deleted and write a worthwhile stub/article in it's place later (or before the VFD ends if possible. You don't need this one line to write that great article. - Mgm|^(talk) 20:13, Jun 24, 2005 (UTC)
  • Change to keep, it's no longer a POV substub. - Mgm|^(talk) 08:29, Jun 25, 2005 (UTC)
  • But most people are far more likely to expand an existing article than to start a new one. Starting an article is a much higher hurdle, and most of the 307,000 registered users haven't jumped it, never mind the millions of unregistered readers. CalJW 21:08, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Comment. If it's POV, edit it until it isn't POV. This is a Wiki. Using VfD to try to alter the content of POV articles is like using dynamite to deal with a toothache. --Tony Sidaway|Talk 21:28, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Comment. The history reveals that this article seems to have been the target of repeated vandalism. It's alternated between POV and NPOV several times. Pburka 23:55, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Merge onto Miami-Dade County, Florida#Independent judiciary and school district — RJH 20:20, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Keep User:GRider/Schoolwatch (preceding unsigned comment by Klonimus 19:26, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC))
• Merge with the appropriate geographical article, to keep the school inclusionists happy. --Carnildo 20:49, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. That would not keep me happy. Merging an article is a form of deletion. It can no longer be categorised in the appropriate place. CalJW 21:08, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. In due course it will improve. --Tony Sidaway|Talk 21:28, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete Schools are not inherently notable. --Xcali 21:42, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. I have added more information to the article. Pburka 23:35, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Keep verifiable and NPOV schools. Nice work Pburka. DoubleBlue (Talk) 01:21, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Keep on the condition that I can add an article about my local Starbucks. — Phil Welch 03:29, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. NPOV, verifiable. Christopher Parham (talk) 04:19, 2005 Jun 25 (UTC)
• Keep in the current form. It had 34 edits today. This proves the point that schools will be improved if they are nominated here. Vegaswikian 06:53, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Comment Cleanup is not an appropriate reason to list a page for deletion. Either the subject is encyclopedic or it isn't. Pburka 12:47, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
    • I agree. Please use {{cleanup-school}} or {{school-stub}}. DoubleBlue (Talk) 13:26, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. All schools are notable enough for a truly great encyclopaedia. —RaD Man (talk) 28 June 2005 07:46 (UTC)
• Delete Not notable. Dunc|☺ 28 June 2005 23:12 (UTC)
• Keep Inherent notability. Unfocused 29 June 2005 00:28 (UTC)
• Keep. Inherent non-non-notability.--Centauri 29 June 2005 07:55 (UTC)
• keep please it is notable Yuckfoo 29 June 2005 19:25 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be placed on a related article talk page, if one exists; in an undeletion request, if it does not; or below this section.