Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Munger, Tolles & Olson

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. - Mailer Diablo 03:46, 3 Apr 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Munger, Tolles & Olson

Ad for a law firm. Delete. -R. fiend 21:49, 25 Mar 2005 (UTC)

• Delete. non-notable. Mikkalai 22:36, 25 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Just an ad with nothing notable. Zzyzx11 23:36, 25 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Promotional, not notable. Interesting compensation scheme, though. android↔talk 23:58, Mar 25, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. It's a law firm. Now, it may be a stereotype, but I'd imagine that the US has rather a lot of law firms these days. Unless a better statement of why this one is exceptional can be made, then this isn't worth keeping. Average Earthman 00:03, 26 Mar 2005 (UTC)
  • It's not a stereotype. It's a reality. android↔talk 00:55, Mar 26, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, not notable, advert. Megan1967 02:06, 26 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Advertisement. Binadot 16:52, 27 Mar 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.