Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Mike Scioscia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was - kept

[edit] Mike Scioscia

There's a pitcher by that name, but this has essentially no content. — Bill 18:30, 6 Oct 2004 (UTC)

• Yes, and thus the article needs considerable work, not deletion. Keep. DS 20:07, 6 Oct 2004 (UTC)
  • I've just fixed it up. DS 20:20, 6 Oct 2004 (UTC)
• Keep DS's new stub. Lord Bob 21:24, Oct 6, 2004 (UTC)
• Notable. Keep. --Slowking Man 23:08, Oct 6, 2004 (UTC)
• Keep. JamesMLane 02:41, 7 Oct 2004 (UTC)
• Keep. This probably should have been sent to the much-overloaded cleanup first, or if cleanup was already tried the fact should be noted here or on the article's talk page. Andrewa 04:07, 7 Oct 2004 (UTC)
• Keep. ...Now that I've looked at the first entry in the "History," I can see why it was up for deletion. Wetman 08:27, 13 Oct 2004 (UTC)

OK, Keep stub as rewritten. Boobykins here still learning the ropes! — Bill 11:42, 7 Oct 2004 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.