Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Melissa treuman

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Melissa treuman

The page is really just a vanity page with no reason that the subject is particularly notable. 216.102.6.176 20:08, 12 Oct 2004 (UTC) [zll]

  • delete and I'm sure she and her husband are very nice, but doesn't appear to be noteworthy. (anon votes don't count btw) Dunc_Harris|☺ 20:09, 12 Oct 2004 (UTC)
  • delete but let's wish her nonetheless, as the soon extinct page suggests, a life long and full of happiness and success --French Tourist 20:10, 12 Oct 2004 (UTC)
  • delete (not notable) but best wishes --Cje 20:12, 12 Oct 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete. There is also a process for candidates for rapid deletion (double bracketted {delete} ), which saves the clumsy process of voting like this. Wetman 20:13, 12 Oct 2004 (UTC)
    • comment: this article is too sane to be speedy deleted, alas.--Ianb 20:14, 12 Oct 2004 (UTC)
  • delete. How sweet. Now let's put that article on a horse-drawn carriage and let it gallop into the sunset. --Ianb 20:14, 12 Oct 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete, ad for JDate. JFW | T@lk 20:17, 12 Oct 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete. I suspect this is someone writing an article for their significant other, much the way people name stars. It's cute, but doesn't belong here. Sorry. --Improv 20:48, 12 Oct 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete. Exceptionally saccharine, bad for your teeth, frightens small children. --Neschek 21:42, 12 Oct 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete and redirect to the Hallmark Channel. Gamaliel 06:41, 13 Oct 2004 (UTC)
  • I give them a year. I give this article about five days. Delete. —Rory ☺ 15:35, Oct 13, 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete. Absolutely useless, in addition: wondering who would be so idiotic as to post such detailed personal info online. rernst 20:47, 15 Oct 2004 (UTC)