Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Law & human rights

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was MERGE to Human rights in Brazil. Already done. The only sensible redirect, however, is to Human rights. I think this satisfies the GFDL since any editor could redirect this anywhere they liked at any time, and the authorship is still retained. -Splash 01:09, 18 August 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Law & human rights

I think the content here does not warrant for a separate article. I suggest that the text be merged with the main article of Brazil and the Law & human rights article be deleted. Besides, "Law & human rights" is highly inaccurate (or rather, too general) since the article is only about Brazil. There may also be neutrality / factual accuracy issues here due to the lack of sources but I won't argue about this since I know nothing of Brazil's prisons. --F. Delpierre 14:37, 10 August 2005 (UTC)

  • Delete I would possibly change my mind if the article was completely redone to talk about the general relationship though. --Apyule 15:12, 10 August 2005 (UTC)
    • Agreed. But if it was deleted, one could always restart it and write something like what you said. I say better delete it now and let what you said happen if someone ever decides to make it happen. The existing content should probably still be kept and moved somewhere, provided it's checked for factual accuracy and backed by some kind of source. --F. Delpierre 17:19, 10 August 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep for a merge to Human rights in Brazil, and redirect to Human rights. Gazpacho 16:38, 10 August 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep & merged Update. ok I have now removed the original and put it in the Human rights in Brazil page, with a reference from Brazil, I hope this helps, clearly the page for Human rights in Brazil needs further work, so at some stage soon I will try to improve it. I agree the original entry needed change, hopefully others will feel it's now ok, author of the page,rastrudwick 12:05, 11 August 2005 (GMT)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.