Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Kismet H.C./Archive

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was NO CONSENSUS. Postdlf 04:12, 13 May 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Kismet H.C.

Vanity for one thing, since it looks like the band themselves might have made this site. Plus, just about every picture is ripped from the band's main website. I don't know a test that it doesn't fail. it probably fails the Music and Notability Guidelines and also the Wikipedia is not a mirror guidelines. Plus I wanted you all to see what might be the ugliest article in the history of Wikipedia. :) Definitely unencyclopedic as well. --Woohookitty 19:16, 30 Apr 2005 (UTC)

• Comment. Never mind! :) I took out the pictures and made it a stub. I will keep the ifd alive though. --Woohookitty 19:40, 30 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. They are a band I've heard of. There are nearly 500 hits in google for the band - which isn't much - so they aren't significant - but it is legit. Kingturtle 20:39, 30 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, not notable. Megan1967 04:32, 1 May 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.