Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Jurij I of Halicz
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was KEEP. —Korath (Talk) 01:38, Feb 28, 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Jurij I of Halicz
Doesn't establish notability, and Wikipedia is not a genealogy database. Radiant! 09:41, Feb 15, 2005 (UTC)
- 13th century polish monarch. Significant, although the article definately needs expanded. Keep - TB 12:22, 2005 Feb 15 (UTC)
- Appears, from superficial research, to have been a prince of Galicia (Central Europe). We tend to Keep monarchs who reigned (and send them to Cleanup for cross-linking them to the countries concerned — Well, whaddayaknow! ☺). Compare Jurij II of Halicz. Uncle G 12:28, 2005 Feb 15 (UTC)
- Keep as he was a regnant king, not that I'm a monarchist or anything! BTW, looks like there may be some need to normalize and redirect spelling, as Jurij I appears to be spelled as Yuriy I in Jurij II of Halicz's article. HyperZonk 17:23, Feb 15, 2005 (UTC)
- Keep, but plainly needs cleanup and expansion. Wyss 18:06, 15 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- Keep, cleanup and expand. Megan1967 00:57, 16 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- Keep and expand. Capitalistroadster 10:28, 16 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- Keep. Deletioncruft nomination.--Centauri 12:16, 20 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- Keep. Delete nominator - David Gerard 15:12, 20 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- Censoring people who disagree with you goes against the very idea of Wikipedia. Note that I didn't even vote to delete him, I merely put the matter up for discussion. Please be civil. Radiant! 12:21, Feb 21, 2005 (UTC)
- Nominating articles on VFD that are obviously not nonsense, vanity or original research - and therefore not valid subjects for deletion in the first place - is a selfish and unneccesary imposition on editors who would rather not have to waste hours of their time ensuring that good content isn't summarily deleted from Wikipedia.--Centauri 13:15, 23 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- Marginal agreement with Centauri. While it's important that everyone feel welcome to nominate articles for VfD, it's also important that they consider the cost of doing so. 8 people each spent perhaps 5 minutes researching Jurij I of Halicz to establish he was worthy of an article here - 40 minutes that may have been better spent. It's not unreasonable to request that a nominator to ask him or herself 'do I believe that the deletion of this article will improve Wikipedia more than 40 minutes of other work would'. - TB 11:06, 2005 Feb 25 (UTC)
- Censoring people who disagree with you goes against the very idea of Wikipedia. Note that I didn't even vote to delete him, I merely put the matter up for discussion. Please be civil. Radiant! 12:21, Feb 21, 2005 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.
