Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Jamshid

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was Keep, and send to cleanup. Vacuum c 02:09, Jan 2, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Jamshid

This was speedied on the grounds that it was nonsense but I think there might be the beginning of a valid article here. According to this page [1] Jamshid was the builder of Persepolis. --LeeHunter 00:08, 28 Dec 2004 (UTC)

• Cleanup. There does appear to be several figures form antiquity named Jamshid, and the article does hint at this. The problem is that the article, as it stands, is very poorly written. Rje 01:14, 28 Dec 2004 (UTC)
• Keep and cleanup. There's a history article here, if someone's willing to rewrite and expand it. Shimeru 02:03, Dec 28, 2004 (UTC)
• Cleanup sounds right. Kappa 02:18, 28 Dec 2004 (UTC)
• Cleanup. Jamshed or Jamshid needs an article. utcursch 10:30, Dec 28, 2004 (UTC)
• Cleanup. "They say the Lion and the Lizard keep/The Courts where Jamshyd gloried and drank deep:/And Bahram, that great Hunter—the Wild Ass/Stamps o'er his head but cannot break his Sleep." "Jamshyd" is mentioned two or three times in FitzGerald's translation of the Rubaiyat of Omar Khayyam. What's good enough for Eddie Fitz is good enough for me. Dpbsmith (talk) 20:38, 28 Dec 2004 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.