This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was KEEP. —Korath (Talk) 18:29, Mar 1, 2005 (UTC)
Cross between bureaucratese jargon, and a dicdef. Radiant! 13:50, Feb 21, 2005 (UTC)
Keep but a complete rewrite is necessary and the title needs to be changed to Internal Communications. Internal Communications is a fast-growing professional field and indicative of a move by big corporations to improve top-down contact between management and employees. It's an important subject and worthy of an article. But the current contents need to be revised considerably. 23skidoo 15:47, 21 Feb 2005 (UTC)
Keep, rewrite and expand. Megan1967 00:26, 23 Feb 2005 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.