Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Francesco

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Speedily deleted by RHaworth per CSD. -- Soir (say hi) 18:43, 5 September 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Francesco

This should not be deleted, it is valuable for the education of today's society. This post has not been made by the submitter of the Francesco Wikipedia description. I am a seperate party and do NOT wish this to be deleted.

DO NOT DELETE PLEASE. Nobody has voted for, so dont be the first any of you. great.

I value this page.

• This nom was malformed and never added to a main VfD page. Fixing and completing now. Weak delete unless more context is added. JYolkowski // talk 13:53, 5 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete the article in its current state. Mindmatrix 14:36, 5 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete (Can this be justified as speedy?) Inherently non-verifiable, un-encyclopedic. RJFJR 15:12, September 5, 2005 (UTC)
• Speedy delete, please, unless someone knows something Google doesn't. First comment comes from the same IP that wrote the article. I invite a remake with context and cited sources if the article's creator wants to do that.. -- Soir (say hi) 15:23, 5 September 2005 (UTC)
• Speedy delete as WP:CSD A1 (lack of content), G3 (vandalism) and/or A7 (non-notable bio). Sixteen-year-old divine manifestations are nonsense (but perhaps not patent nonsense in the strict Wikipedia sense). --IByte 15:29, 5 September 2005 (UTC)
• Speedy delete surely? Average Earthman 16:41, 5 September 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.