Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Fire at will

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete. · Katefan0(scribble) 16:40, 13 September 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Fire at will

VfD tag added by anon but nomination never completed. This page has previously been transwiki'd to Wiktionary. No vote, I'm undecided whether this is a valid encyclopedia topic or not. JYolkowski // talk 13:55, 5 September 2005 (UTC)

  • Delete as bad precedent. Army orders as articles? Why not add "Good evening ladies and gentlemen" or "this is not a test!" Also, I suspect (though someone can correct me) that movies rather than actual army commanders are fond of the saying. Marskell 18:19, 5 September 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete, already tranwikified and no info apart from a dic def. Can't ever be more than a dic def. - Mgm|(talk) 19:28, September 5, 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete. One could imagine a non-dic-def article about this, however. (Like, what is the origin of the term, is it actually used, what problems does it present, etc., etc.) Sdedeo 20:41, 5 September 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete at will. — Phil Welch 01:02, 6 September 2005 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.