Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Fahrenheit 9/11½
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was keep. --Tony SidawayTalk 04:55, 3 August 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Fahrenheit 9/11½
Crystal ball, likely hoax (see talk page). Delete with prejudice. Grue 21:38, 19 July 2005 (UTC)
- Delete unverifiable. JamesBurns 08:30, 20 July 2005 (UTC)
- If you're pointing out an Anonymous user made the article - so? It's on IMDB. Good enough for me. Keep. -- A Link to the Past 11:09, July 20, 2005 (UTC)
- That's like saying: "It's in Wikipedia - so it must be true!". Grue 11:57, 20 July 2005 (UTC)
- Did some Anonymous user throw the movie on IMDB? -- A Link to the Past 18:16, July 20, 2005 (UTC)
- That's like saying: "It's in Wikipedia - so it must be true!". Grue 11:57, 20 July 2005 (UTC)
- Merge with Fahrenheit 9/11: Until the movie actually comes out, a note about a possible sequel on the main article will be sufficient. Peter Grey 15:19, 20 July 2005 (UTC)
- Merge with Fahrenheit 9/11, not a hoax (I remember Moore saying it, and anyway Variety article confirms), but, movie projects are notorious for falling into "development hell", so speculation at this point. Can be reconstituted later if precise release date is set or some other irrevertible proof that it's actually going to get done comes up. Dcarrano 15:20, July 20, 2005 (UTC)
- Keep MSNBC article --Arcadian 19:05, 20 July 2005 (UTC)
- Keep as per Arcadian's article. ~ Eszett 12:17, 24 July 2005 (UTC)
- Merge per Peter Grey and Dcarrano. DS1953 03:10, July 25, 2005 (UTC)
- Keep for reasons stated above Av 19:51, 26 July 2005 (UTC)
- Merge with Fahrenheit 9/11 and make Fahrenheit 9/11½ a redirect until the actual movie comes out. --81.154.237.252 13:20, 29 July 2005 (UTC)
- Keep movie will be made. CanadianCaesar 03:17, 30 July 2005 (UTC)
- Keep We really won't know till it does or doesn't come out. Hold on to it until we get verifiable proof.
- Keep Keep this for the next year or so. If more plans do not come out on this sequal, remove this thread. KEEP
- Keep it! --Spe88 05:33, August 2, 2005 (UTC)
- Keep - Darwinek 16:39, 2 August 2005 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.