Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/EyeQ

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. Joyous 19:40, Feb 19, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] EyeQ

Name used for some tech articles, not notable enough. Radiant! 11:37, 13 Feb 2005 (UTC)

• Delete - not very helpful or encylodedic Brookie 12:00, 13 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• It's an attempt at a disambiguation page. I think that the best way to create disambiguation pages is to let them grow naturally from the conflicts that arise between articles with the same names. There's nothing wrong with creating a disambiguation page from scratch, of course, provided that one is also going to create the articles that it disambiguates amongst. Had this page just been created hours ago and with some dangling hyperlinks on it, I'd have given the page the benefit of the doubt. As it is, it has been five months and this page has seen effectively zero growth. The dangling hyperlinks that were there were never filled in. Indeed, the original article seemed to be a weak attempt to justify advertising the fourth item by masquerading as a disambiguation for the other three. They are all simply non-notable brand names as far as I can tell. There is, however, a record label "Eye Q" that appears to fulfil the Wikipedia:WikiProject Music/Notability and Music Guidelines criteria, although I'll let others be the final judges of that. The article could be completely rewritten to be about that. Move to Eye Q if that happens. Otherwise Delete and allow Eye Q to happen

• Keep- and rewrite the article --¿? 16:53, 13 Feb 2005 (UTC)
  • Check this user's contributions: personal-attack pranks, vandalism, bogus inquiries about Nelson Mandela, etc. This may not be a genuine vote. -- 17:49, 13 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Delete - there's no article here, and no articles being disambiguated. -- Cyrius|✎ 17:21, 13 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, this is a stealth ad. Wyss 01:58, 14 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. No real content, it does look like an ad. Carrp | Talk 17:47, 15 Feb 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.