Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Eastman Chemical Company

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep. Sjakkalle (Check!) 11:28, 12 September 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Eastman Chemical Company

This article looks like a vanity page. It's as if their PR group came to Wikipedia and wrote the article by copy/pasting straight from their corporate website.

Original nomination by User:Steffinb Pilatus 10:44, 5 September 2005 (UTC)

Keep: "Eastman Chemical is the largest industrial employer in the state of Tennessee and one its largest employers overall", the prose is not overtly PR, it is significant it is no longer part of the declining Kodak empire. --Gorgonzilla 17:48, 18 August 2005 (UTC)

• This nom was never added to a main VfD page and was malformed nonetheless; fixing now. Keep. JYolkowski // talk 22:20, 4 September 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. Will people put up Agilent for VfD next? Pilatus 22:48, 4 September 2005 (UTC)
• Keep as significant company. Capitalistroadster 01:32, 5 September 2005 (UTC)
• Keep; company is listed on New York Stock Exchange and has over $6 billion in annual sales. --Metropolitan90 01:36, September 5, 2005 (UTC)
• Keep; I'll see if I can expand it over the next few days. It's a shame that Eastman smell is unencyclopedic.... — Lomn | Talk / RfC 03:09, 5 September 2005 (UTC)
• Keep current version and expand. Notable company. Thatdog 08:20, 5 September 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.