Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Count Anan

New research, though apparantly not written for wikipedia, not established or even well-known. --fvw * 02:34, 2004 Nov 24 (UTC)

Delete. Not encyclopedic, resembles essay or (poor) inaugural or prelection speech by some history professor. I couldn't verify the contents with Google, anyone more knowledgeable in ancient history wanting to check this? jni 08:25, 24 Nov 2004 (UTC)
Delete: Why is it called "Count Anan" in the first place? Contents don't match title. The material sounds highly suspicious. Something with that many novel claims must be verified, and probably peer reviewed, before we have any business reporting it. We are not a way around the peer review process. Geogre 13:40, 24 Nov 2004 (UTC)
Delete. Title isn't related to the article, and the article is obviously original research. Inky 20:13, 24 Nov 2004 (UTC)
Delete. What they said. Pisser that this has to hang around for a week before being trashed. --Tagishsimon (talk)
Delete. All edits by anon IP 66.81.0.10 were bogus too, including attempts to link to this article. Etz Haim 22:20, 25 Nov 2004 (UTC)