Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Charge of Aradia

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was keep. Joyous 18:48, Jan 16, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Charge of Aradia

I'm not a Wiccan. Is this really important/encyclopedic?--ZayZayEM 07:53, 30 Dec 2004 (UTC)

• Keep. It's an encyclopedic enough subject. The Aradia thing apparently came from a Tuscan woman called Maddelena via Charles Leland. Leland produced a book called "ARADIA or the Gospel of the Witches" in 1899. There are some doubts about its authenticity, but many Wiccans take this stuff just about as seriously as a Wiccan can take anything. This article could use some cleanup. --Tony Sidaway|Talk 12:40, 30 Dec 2004 (UTC)
• Merge with Charge of the Goddess, and discuss the several variations and some of the history of the text there. This text from Aradia is the literary source of that one. -- Smerdis of Tlön 17:20, 30 Dec 2004 (UTC)
  • I agree with this suggestion.--ZayZayEM 00:54, 1 Jan 2005 (UTC)
• Keep, but needs a definite clean up and expansion on the history of the Charge. Megan1967 01:47, 31 Dec 2004 (UTC)
• Keep and allow for organic growth/expansion. GRider\^talk 18:33, 31 Dec 2004 (UTC)
• Merge with Charge of the Goddess Jayjg | (Talk) 03:59, 3 Jan 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.