Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Bumvertising

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Keep --Ryan Delaney ^talk 05:32, 21 September 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Bumvertising

This is an advertisement. Well, actually a hoax that leads to an advertisement 216.35.131.141 14:53, 26 August 2005 (UTC)

• Keep As the original author of the article, I started it after seeing numerous mentions in the media - TV and national newspapers. It's certainly no hoax. Nor is it an advertisement, it's a method of advertisement. I specifically avoided linking to or highlighting the products/inventor of the term. SchmuckyTheCat 15:37, 26 August 2005 (UTC)
• Keep Idleguy 18:11, August 26, 2005 (UTC)
• Weak keep The major news media have decreed "It's Noteworthy". And, no, I don't think this page is an ad. Nowhither 06:52, 27 August 2005 (UTC)
• Keep Not an ad or a hoax. Has been getting major press in Los Angeles. Sean Bonner 00:18, August 31, 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. Like Sean said. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ospheric (talk • contribs) 22:05, 30 August 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Advertising. Gamaliel 03:58, 31 August 2005 (UTC)
• Weak Keep. The article was clearly used to contribute to the promotion of the publicity campaign, but it has attracted media notice from reputable outlets. I have cleaned up the article to put the campaign into a little more context and added a couple of references. Dystopos 04:39, 31 August 2005 (UTC)
• Strong Keep. With all of the media buzz this topic has been receiving, I wouldn't be surprised to see the term used more frequently within the English language vernacular. SeattleAssAsher
• Keep. I suppose the media attention qualifies. --Netvor 07:38, 1 September 2005 (UTC)
• Strong Keep. I've actually seen it up here, and it was on the local news (granted, it was a slow news day.) This is also not an ad Bob the Cannibal 19:16, 8 September 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. I like. I personally bumvertise in my spare time. Right now I'm in the local library. Its the only form of employment I can get, bumvertising.
• This afd nomination was orphaned. Listing now. No opinion. —Cryptic (talk) 13:15, 13 September 2005 (UTC)
• Keep - however revolting and morality-free. Vizjim 15:35, 13 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. nn. Andrew pmk | Talk 23:17, 13 September 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. Notable cultural phenomenon. And hey, I didn't know you could sponsor Frank Chu's signs! --MCB 07:14, 14 September 2005 (UTC)
• Here in Russia it's a common practice...  Grue  15:11, 14 September 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. This just hit The Daily Show (prompting me to check Wikipedia for an article), and I see that it has been receiving a great deal of media attention. The practice (assuming that it's not a Joey Skaggs-style prank) is disgusting and reprehensible, but that's irrelevant. And if it does turn out to be a hoax, that will be equally noteworthy. —Lifeisunfair 04:30, 21 September 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.