Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Bob "Lunchbox" Caverty

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was Speedy delete. --Carnildo 04:20, 19 Mar 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Bob "Lunchbox" Caverty

The article claims he is one of the formost artist advocates of gay rights, but he has no relevant google hits. Delete as not notable. Thue | talk 21:18, 18 Mar 2005 (UTC)

• Speedy delete as probable and likely hoax or personal attack. --GRider\^talk 21:44, 18 Mar 2005 (UTC)
  • Comment. I have followed this up with a {{speedy}} tag combined with a note on the talk page. --GRider\^talk 21:47, 18 Mar 2005 (UTC)
  • I would think this is vanity rather than a personal attack. Thue | talk 21:58, 18 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. No matter if personal attack or vanity, it's not worth to keep. --Neigel von Teighen 21:59, 18 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, not notable, possible personal attack. Megan1967 23:15, 18 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, nn attackcruft. ComCat 02:44, 19 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Speedy deleted, per the request ... before wikipedia gets sued by libel. - DavidWBrooks 03:37, 19 Mar 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.