Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Birla Institute of Technology

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was KEEP. —Korath (Talk) 02:58, Feb 28, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Birla Institute of Technology

Notability not established. No content except for a URL and a photograph. Is every school or uni by itself notable? Radiant! 13:20, Feb 16, 2005 (UTC)

• Keep. Any institution with a research program [1] is notable, and what do you mean "no content"? Kappa 13:32, 16 Feb 2005 (UTC)
  • What I meant was that the article didn't provide any interesting facts about said institute. Of course the webpage does. Very well, request withdrawn, mark as edu-stub. Radiant! 13:58, Feb 16, 2005 (UTC)
  • Edited out unneeded final paragraph. Keep educational institutions are notable. Mgm|^(talk) 14:06, Feb 16, 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. Trilobite (Talk) 15:18, 16 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Keep, these Indian technical colleges are influential and encyclopedic. Wyss 18:57, 16 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Keep and expand. Real educational institution. Capitalistroadster 09:29, 17 Feb 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.