Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Benham & Froud

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete. CDC (talk) 8 July 2005 22:19 (UTC)

[edit] Benham & Froud

non-notable, non wikied, biased, not really worth being an article unless someone wants to do a major rewrite. Elfguy 1 July 2005 20:09 (UTC)

• Delete - may be notable subject, hard to tell, but this article is beyond salvation. Naturenet | Talk 1 July 2005 20:45 (UTC)
• Delete – I concur with Naturenet's assessment. – Mipadi July 1, 2005 21:11 (UTC)
• Delete not encyclopedic. JamesBurns 2 July 2005 04:17 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be placed on a related article talk page, if one exists; in an undeletion request, if it does not; or below this section.