Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Alexis Leick

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete. Redwolf24 (talk) 04:30, 5 September 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Alexis Leick

Not notable - not a single reference found on Google with name in quotes Groeck 03:28, 27 August 2005 (UTC)

If she is, I don't think mearly being in the same family as someone noteable constitutes noteability. — Kjammer ⌂ 07:46, 27 August 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete Not noteable — Kjammer ⌂ 07:46, 27 August 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete Not noteable --Cje 09:14, 27 August 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete without prejudice, until the episode airs and she's credited with a guest appearance on SVU. Paul Klenk 10:18, 27 August 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete, two guest appearences and no major roles of which neither can be found on IMDB or tv.com. Personally, I would have prejudice against recreation, because one guest role is not important enough for an article. (And if you look at my userpage you'll note I support articles on kid actors wherever possible.) - Mgm|(talk) 10:44, August 27, 2005 (UTC)

*Merge and re-direct into Hudson Leick if it can be confirmed that she's her daughter (sounds like it, since the article mentions her not being as famous as her mom). --rob 14:34, 27 August 2005 (UTC)

  • Delete. I would go with rob's merge vote, but the total absence of Google hits and the fact that she is not mentioned at all in Hudson Leick's IMDB bio makes her very existence somewhat dubious to me. Will consider changing vote if a reference can be cited. Fernando Rizo T/C 18:23, 27 August 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete. Non-notable. Steve Casburn 21:11, 27 August 2005 (UTC)
  • Re-direct to Hudson Leick, but do not merge with article. Instead put the information in a section of Talk:Hudson Leick. A future person looking for the "daughter" will find a semi-relevant article. This is somewhat similiar to many re-directs which are for mis-spelling, fictional character names, or entirely erroneous names/terms. Also, this puts the "daughter" story in a place where more knowledgable people will see it (who can affirm or debunk it). --rob 00:48, 28 August 2005 (UTC)
  • delete or redirect as above, Pref delete, non notable. Shropshire Lad 19:29, 30 August 2005 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.