Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Albert Madejczyk

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Albert Madejczyk

Albert Madejczyk was proposed for deletion. This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was delete.

  • Delete: An attack on someone, I NPOVed it which doesn't leave much. --fvw* 01:18, 2004 Dec 23 (UTC)
  • I'll say it doesn't leave much. Would have been rather entertaining if you hadn't NPOVed it. Anyway, delete. --PacknCanes 04:51, 23 Dec 2004 (UTC)
  • Comment: Did the recent upgrade break something? The history shows that Fvw was the initial author. The earlier attack version isn't there. As the history currently stands, it's a CSD. Dbenbenn 04:56, 23 Dec 2004 (UTC)
    • Maybe speedied between edits? Delete what remains. iMeowbot~Mw 05:28, 23 Dec 2004 (UTC)
      • Yeah, it was incorrectly tagged as a speedy when I found it. The original was about 5 sentences long, nearly all of them NPOV and libelous. I believe the main allegation was that the subject had blackmailed someone. --fvw* 05:36, 2004 Dec 23 (UTC)
        • I presume this means to say "POV and libelous". -- Jmabel | Talk 06:42, Dec 23, 2004 (UTC)
          • Ehm, yes. I'm not even sure NPOV and libelous is possible, though it may be under british law, which is kind of strict even about repeating libel while attributing. --fvw* 14:00, 2004 Dec 23 (UTC)
  • Speedy delete - "A person" - CSD, lack of context/definition. -- Cyrius|✎ 08:08, 23 Dec 2004 (UTC)
    • Yes, but it had a history with context; An article which has been edited down to something lacking lacking context does not become a CSD, it also has to have no meaningful history (which this did have, the fact that the history was a piece of POV crud notwithstanding). --fvw* 14:00, 2004 Dec 23 (UTC)
      • The prior history was a CSD as vandalism, which was deleted by Graham ☺ with the comment "nonsense". -- Cyrius|✎ 17:48, 23 Dec 2004 (UTC)
        • Delete. I've undeleted the previous history, so it's all now visible for this discussion. Andrewa 19:25, 23 Dec 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete, attack, non-notable. Dbenbenn 18:31, 24 Dec 2004 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.