Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Adam Kidd

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. Joyous 01:18, Jan 11, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Adam Kidd

Not notable. Fails google and IMDB tests. utcursch 10:23, Dec 28, 2004 (UTC)

• Delete. --fvw* 10:27, 2004 Dec 28 (UTC)
• Delete, either vanity, or an article about one of the millions of people trying to get into the movie-game, not-notable. Rje 16:14, 28 Dec 2004 (UTC)
• Delete, nn vanity, probable auto-bio. Wyss 19:56, 28 Dec 2004 (UTC)
• Delete, this and related articles. -Ld | talk 00:29, 29 Dec 2004 (UTC)
• Keep - He might become notable. -- Judson 22:26, 29 Dec 2004 (UTC)
• Delete. Mikkalai 23:21, 29 Dec 2004 (UTC)
• Keep, I agree with Judson. -- Crevaner 00:02, 30 Dec 2004 (UTC)
• Delete. Xezbeth 12:20, Dec 30, 2004 (UTC)
• Delete - if he becomes notable, a new page can be made. I wouldn't hold my breath, though. DreamGuy 02:16, Jan 2, 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.